![]() The lawsuit was dismissed in December by U.S. Marik alleged he lost his positions at a medical school and at a hospital for promoting the use of ivermectin. Bowden lost admitting privileges at a Texas hospital, the ruling noted. All three said their reputations were harmed by the FDA campaign. “The Doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA’s Posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to.”ĭrs. It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise-but not to endorse, denounce, or advise,” Judge Don Willett wrote for a panel that also included Jennifer Walker Elrod and Edith Brown Clement. The doctors can proceed with their lawsuit contending that the FDA's campaign exceeded the agency's authority under federal law, the ruling said. ![]() ![]() But the ruling said the campaign - which at times featured the slogan “You are not a horse!” - too often left out that the drug is sometimes prescribed for humans. The ruling acknowledged FDA's receiving reports of some people requiring hospitalization after self-medicating with ivermectin intended for livestock. Circuit Court of Appeal in New Orleans focused on various aspects of an FDA campaign against ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment. The agency did not immediately respond to requests for comment.įriday's ruling from a panel of three judges on the 5th U.S. The FDA has not approved ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment because studies have not proven it is effective. It can also be prescribed for humans and it has been championed by some conservatives as a treatment for COVID-19. Ivermectin is commonly used to treat parasites in livestock. NEW ORLEANS – A federal appeals court Friday revived a lawsuit by three doctors who say the Food and Drug Administration overstepped its authority in a campaign against treating COVID-19 with the anti-parasite drug ivermectin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |